Mandatory Lab Sequence & Script Independence
Mandatory lab sequence
Every Meridian chapter lab follows this order unless the medium makes a stage genuinely inapplicable. If a stage is omitted, the lab author should know why rather than silently skipping it.
| Stage | Standard |
|---|---|
| A. DMBOK concept target | State exactly which chapter concepts the lab makes concrete. Do not silently expand beyond the source. |
| B. Business situation | Explain the Meridian process and decision that produced the problem. Data never appears without a business reason. |
| C. Technology prerequisite gate | List required SQL/Python/PostgreSQL/DBeaver or other skill depth. If the learner is not ready, use the Technology Roadmap and train with a learner-selected resource before continuing. |
| D. Predict before touching the tool | Require a prediction about what should happen or what the learner expects to find. |
| E. Perform | Carry out the technical, management, or decision work. |
| F. Interpret | Explain what the evidence/output means rather than merely capturing it. |
| G. Break / vary / counterexample | When safe and useful, change an assumption or inject a defect so the learner can see why the concept matters. |
| H. Repair | Correct the problem using the chapter concept and record why the response fits. |
| I. Rebuild independently | Recreate the learning-critical portion with reduced scaffolding rather than replaying the tutorial. |
| J. Evidence | Save scripts, query results, decisions, diagrams, before/after metrics, and concise notes. |
| K. DMBOK Debrief | Translate the experience back into DAMA terminology and distinguish neighboring concepts. |
| L. Retrieval / scenario check | Finish with a short closed-book explanation or scenario. |
Required lab-guide sections
The separate Execution/Evidence/QC standard requires the learner-facing guide to include:
- DMBOK Targets
- Meridian Business Situation
- Prerequisite Gate
- Learning Outcomes
- Predict First
- Hands-On Work
- Evidence to Save
- Interpret the Evidence
- Break It / Change One Fact
- Repair / Decide
- Rebuild Independently
- DMBOK Debrief
- Answer / Reconstruction Key
- Completion Rubric
- Source / Implementation Notes
Script-independence standard
A script can accelerate practice, but a script you cannot explain is not mastery.
Five-pass rule
- Annotate: explain every important line/clause in plain language.
- Modify: change inputs, filters, table names, conditions, or outputs to reveal what is essential versus incidental.
- Predict: state at least one expected result before execution.
- Rebuild: recreate a smaller equivalent from a blank editor.
- Explain purpose: state the business/Data Management reason for the logic without referring to syntax.
For long setup/boilerplate, independence is judged on the learning-critical portion, not memorization of boilerplate.
Independence test
If the learner can make the screenshot but cannot explain the query, table grain, business rule, source-to-target meaning, or governance decision, the lab is not complete.
| Check | Pass condition |
|---|---|
| Explain | Can explain the concept and technical action without reading the step. |
| Modify | Can change an input/condition and predict the effect. |
| Rebuild | Can recreate the learning-critical portion from a blank file/editor. |
| Diagnose | Can interpret a common failure or unexpected output. |
| Transfer | Can choose the right approach in a changed Meridian scenario. |
Source: Applied Laboratory Master Program Guide Sections 4–5; Applied Lab Execution/Evidence/QC Standard Sections 1 and 5.