Skip to content

Visual Maps 7–12

Map 7 — Matching Workflow Ladder

Redraw from least to most intervention:

DUPLICATE IDENTIFICATION → flag/review only

MATCH-LINK → connect identity through cross-reference; source attributes intact

MATCH-MERGE → reconcile attributes into unified record

Write beside the ladder: intervention / survivorship / reversal cost generally increase downward.

Source: pp. 345–346.


Map 8 — Identifier Map

Redraw:

Source A ID ─┐
Source B ID ─┼→ X-REF MAPPING + HISTORYGLOBAL ID
Source C ID ─┘

Interpretation: Source IDs remain valid locally. Global ID represents enterprise identity. X-Ref is the traceability relationship, including merge/unmerge changes.

Answer check: X-Ref is not another identifier.

Source: pp. 346–347.


Map 9 — Hub Architecture Choice

Registry

INDEX → SORs
Data stays in source systems; registry points.

Transaction Hub

APPLICATIONS ↔ HUB = SOR
Hub owns Master Data updates.

Consolidated

SOURCE SORs → replicated/reconciled HUB = SYSTEM OF REFERENCE → consumers
Sources keep writes; hub stores shared copy.

Interpretation: Ask who owns writes and whether the central platform stores a consumer copy.

Source: pp. 349–351.


Map 10 — RDM Controlled Change

Redraw:
REQUEST → IDENTIFY STAKEHOLDERS → IDENTIFY IMPACT → DECIDE / APPROVE → UPDATE → COMMUNICATE / INFORM

Interpretation: Broad sharing makes even small changes potentially consequential. Impact assessment precedes implementation.

Source: pp. 353–357.


Map 11 — Governance Operating Loop

Redraw:
GOVERNANCE sets authority, DQ rules, use conditions, monitoring, approval gates
→ STEWARDSHIP handles content and exceptions
→ METRICS / MONITORING reveal gaps
→ IMPROVEMENT updates rules/processes
→ back to GOVERNANCE

Interpretation: Technology does not close the control loop by itself.

Source: pp. 357–359.


Map 12 — Value Evidence

Draw TRUSTWORTHY SHARED DATA in the center with seven spokes:

  1. DQ & compliance
  2. change activity
  3. ingestion & consumption
  4. SLA/service performance
  5. steward coverage
  6. total cost of ownership
  7. sharing volume / usage

Interpretation: Different metrics answer different management questions. Repository volume alone does not prove value.

Source: pp. 358–359.

Final visual test

Rebuild Maps 3, 5, 7, 9, and 10 on a blank page. If authority, sequence, or arrows are uncertain, return to Guided Learning before timed questions.

← Maps 1–6 · Battle Cards →