Cross-Scenario Decision Grid & Changed-Fact Drill
Primary reasoning pattern
| Scenario | Leading Chapter 2 lens | Leading operational KA |
|---|---|---|
| S1 | Ethical vs legal; Respect; purpose/transparency | Data Governance |
| S2 | Justice; bias/group fairness | Data Governance |
| S3 | Purpose, retention, minimization, accountability | Data Governance |
| S4 | Misleading visualization | DW/BI |
| S5 | Bias — hunch and search / biased use | DW/BI |
| S6 | Transformation/integration; provenance/lineage/Metadata/quality | Data Integration & Interoperability |
| S7 | Obfuscation/redaction; re-identification | Data Security |
| S8 | Ethical culture; practices/controls/escalation | Data Governance |
| S9 | Governance + Legal + practitioner responsibility; four checkpoints | Data Governance |
Changed-fact mastery check
Answer before looking below.
- S4 changes from a truncated axis to a selectively chosen observation window. Which risk leads?
- S2 changes from group disparity to lack of meaningful choice. Which principle leads?
- S6 gains perfect lineage/Metadata/quality, but names are merely removed and people can be reconstructed. Which §3.4 risk leads?
- S8 has strong training, safe escalation and monitoring but lacks organization-wide handling standards. What gap is now more important?
Answer check
- Timing.
- Respect for Persons.
- Obfuscation/redaction and re-identification risk.
- Governance standards/policy/oversight.
Repair rule after a miss
Tag the miss before rereading: - principle confusion; - legal-vs-ethical shortcut; - privacy-theme confusion; - risk-pattern misclassification; - role/oversight confusion; - missed qualifier; - overthinking; - weak source recall.
Then return only to the relevant Battle Card or Guided Learning section and retest with the changed-fact version.